This article like the rest of this issue of the Review of African Political Economy is openly accessible without the need to subscribe or register. For 50 years, ROAPE has brought our readers path-breaking analysis on radical African political economy in our quarterly review, and for more than ten years on our website.
Subscriptions and donations are essential to keeping our review and website alive. Please consider subscribing or donating today. Civil war deeply disrupted policing in Sierra Leone and Rwanda, leaving their state police forces inadequate in numbers, skills and resources to serve all citizens. In this security vacuum local forms of policing play an important role. The article argues that the country-specific pattern of local forms of policing depends on three factors: the nature of the conflict and peace settlement; the regime ideology; and the level of regime insecurity and fear of conflict recurring.
The empirical data concerning the local policing groups is presented under three headings: crime prevention and intervention; investigation and resolution; and punishment.
The article concludes with an assessment of the hazards and potential for states and donors supporting such groups. They are certainly flawed agencies in the eyes of both users and government, but in a context of less than fair and accountable state policing, their widespread provision and support is not to be dismissed lightly. Civil war deeply disrupts and transforms policing.
The two civil wars seriously undermined the ability of the states of Sierra Leone and Rwanda to maintain the rule of law Baker, b ; b. The state police were decimated during Sierra Leone's civil war β 1 and virtually dissolved in Rwanda's civil war and subsequent genocide of Neither state has the resources to offer the protection from crime and the investigation of crime that their people seek.
