
WEIGHT: 46 kg
Bust: B
One HOUR:150$
NIGHT: +30$
Services: Face Sitting, Food Sex, Oral, Toys, Fisting anal
To walk into the Americans Energy Summit, as I did last fall in New Orleans, is to glimpse an arresting new reality: fossil fuel companies claiming to be leaders of the energy transition. No longer is the problem fossil fuels, but emissions, which can be managed with the existing technological know-how of the fossil fuel industry.
They are supported in this endeavor by an array of liberal environmental organizations. While troubled by the connection between CCS and fossil fuel companies, several scholars farther left have argued for the possible uses of this technology were it to be inserted into radically different social relations.
The progressive argument for DAC arises from the problem of overshoot: because of decades of denial and delay, even a rapid cessation of fossil fuel combustion would leave excess carbon dioxide in the atmosphere that must be drawn down. This makes even the most trenchant critics of the fossil fuel industry reluctant to dismiss DAC tout court. They conclude, however, that DAC may soon become a fait accompli. The Promises and Perils of Geoengineering on the Brink , ed.
Parenti argues that the problem is not the technology, but the social relations in which it is embedded. Carbon removal should be decommodified and treated as a public utility.
Buck argues that CCS could be these things if it were used to capture emissions from industry or gas-fired power plants, rather than being used to prolong coal or drill more oil through a process, known as enhanced oil recovery EOR , in which carbon dioxide is injected into depleted wells to extract more oil.